Operational Report 7th Queen’s Own Hussars December 1941

Background

The 7 Queen’s Own Hussars were one of the cruiser-equipped armoured regiments in 7 Armoured Brigad, 7 Armoured Division, the famous “Desert Rats”, under 30 Corps, Eighth Army.  The regiment did not have a happy operation, and by 27th November was moved to the Left Out of Battle (L.O.B.) camp near Bir Telata, after the last three tanks had been evacuated.  It then formed a composite squadron of Stuart tanks, which was instructed by US soldiers.

The action on 21st November referred to in the report below left the regiment with only 12 to 20 tanks (instead of a normal state of close to 60 – only 1 tank had been lost until then), and the regimental commander Lt.Col. Byass DSO MC was killed. 

I will post further information on this engagement another day.

After these few days of battle, the regiment did not return to the desert for a while, and was instead fully re-equipped with US-built M3 Stuart tanks, and sent to Burma, to hold the Japanese assault in South Asia.It then returned to Europe and saw the end of the war in Italy. Together with 2 R.T.R. is thus one of the few tank regiments to have fought in North Africa, Burma, and Europe.

Crusader

Crusader tanks moving to forward positions in the Western Desert, unknown unit, 26 November 1941. IWM Photo No.: E 6724[1]

OPERATIONAL REPORT, 7th QUEEN’S OWN HUSSARS DECEMBER, 1941.

Reference the attached report of Operations carried out by this Regiment between November 18th, and November 29th, 1941, I append a few remarks in amplification of the report.

(1) German methods of tank warfare.

In the initial stages the enemy appeared to move his tank force in a concentrated mass. The column which attacked 7th Hussars on November 21st was a densely packed tank force numbering some 150 tanks. (N.B. These were actually counted approximately and this figure does not include tanks out of sight.) A/Tank and/or field guns appeared to be up with the tanks. Thus the full weight of attack of what may have been over half the total enemy tank strength descended on one British Regiment. Had close artillery support, i.e. 25 – pounder guns up in line with the 7th Hussars been available at the commencement of the engagement, very heavy destruction of enemy tanks must have resulted owing to their close formation. The enemy opened fire at long range and several tanks of the 7’h Hussars were destroyed before they could close to effective 2 – pounder range. The enemy appeared to fire three distinct types of ammunition.

(a) An ordinary H.E. shell – either from guns mounted in tanks or from artillery up with the tanks.

(b) An A/Tank armour-piercing shot, varying in destructive power, probably from different types of gun.

(c) An incendiary shell which on explosion generated terrific heat and caused our tanks to catch fire, even though the shell hit the front of the turret.

After 21st November, the German tank force appeared to split up into smaller columns which on the following days engaged unprotected M.T. Echelons and was a source of danger to our communications and higher headquarters.

(2) A separate report has been rendered regarding certain technical difficulties experienced with the A 15 Cruiser tanks.

(3) It is suggested that the following lessons were brought out during the operations:

(a) The importance of keeping sufficiently concentrated to maintain numerical superiority in the initial engagement against the enemy’s main force.

(b) The necessity for early information regarding the enemy’s movements – in particular those of his main force. Information on November 21 S` arrived too late for 7th Armoured Brigade to concentrate.

(c) Unless and until we have a tank gun which can equal that of the most modern German tanks opposed to us, 25 – pounder support under direct control of Regimental Commanders is essential. At 2,000 yards over open sights the 25 – pounder is a good A/Tank weapon, (vide subsequent action of the 4th Indian Division, R.A., which destroyed some 17 enemy tanks for the loss of only four guns). Desultory shelling at long range by 25 – pounders against enemy A.F.V.s is of little or no value.

(d) Tanks of a Regiment should be all of the same type. 7th Hussars went into action with a mixture of A 15, A 13, and A 10 Cruiser tanks. Even the A 15 tanks were of different makes and certain gun spares were non-interchangeable.

(e) A Echelons should be reduced to the minimum required for immediate replenishment, medical services and repairs to tanks. A Echelons are very vulnerable and, being close up behind the A.F.V.s are liable to be cut off by enemy columns. A small A Echelon can escape more easily than a large one.

(f) All B vehicles not with the A Echelons should be with Brigade B Echelons. Intermediate Echelons are not practicable and merely constitute further vulnerable bodies of M.T. liable to become cut off and lost.

(g) In open desert warfare, B Echelons will frequently, once the main tank forces have joined in battle, not be able to replenish units at night. Indication of leaguer location by firing verey lights is dangerous.

ABBASSIA, December, 1941.

(Signed) Major Commanding 7th Queen’s Own Hussars.

[1]I am not convinced that this picture is correctly dated, since the tanks do not show the CRUSADER operational white/red/white stripe marking that was to be prominently displayed.

4 thoughts on “Operational Report 7th Queen’s Own Hussars December 1941

  1. Interesting – Hussars begging/demanding intimate support from the 25-prs. My kneejerk reaction is “harden up, and sort your dopey tactics out!”. Also, 25-pr in the direct fire role is a waste of resources.

    Also, the comment about verey lights being dangerous to use at night (presumably due to giving the position away to both sides) is odd. I understand the Germans made extensive use of their flares for exactly that purpose. Also, decent map reading coupled with comms that an armd regiment should be able to take for granted should have menat that stealthy replenishment by night was a simple task.

    Overall, the above report smacks of a unit – and command echelon – well out of their depth.

    Like

  2. I think that is maybe a bit on the harsh side. The CO could be forgiven for being a bit shell-shocked, since he lost not only his commander but 3/4s of the regiment within a very short time, when it was overrun by the two German Panzerdivisions. Even with proper tactics, the regiment would not have stood a chance in the situation they found themselves in.

    I agree about the comment about the very lights though, that one is strange.

    Like

  3. Shell-shocked indeed. R.D. Lawrence was a 7th Hussars tank-gunner during the Sidi Rezegh hecatomb; in his memoir there’s a harrowing account of what it’s like when an 88 mm. shell enters the turret. I’ll get it up on my site, when the narrative reaches 22 November.

    Like

  4. Pingback: North Africa Sidi Rezegh 1941 - World War 2 Talk

Leave a comment